Spanish form 296: the annual IRNR summary
Which payments belong on the annual summary, why it will not reconcile with your form 216s, and the filing deadline.

| Kind of income | On the 216 | On the 296 |
|---|---|---|
| Taxable and not exempt | Yes | Yes |
| Exempt under article 14 or a treaty | No | Yes |
| Exempt under article 14.1.k) or l) | Yes | Yes |
| Spanish government debt (article 14.1.d) | No | No |
- Even with no withholding on this payment, the third paragraph of article 15.1 may still require a nil form 216 for it, subject to the six carve-outs in article 2.3 of the Order.
- This is the case that makes the annual summary wider than the sum of the 216s: article 15.2 requires the nominal list to include anyone paid income «on which no withholding was practised».
The annual summary reports payments your form 216s never saw
Article 31.4.a) of the consolidated act exempts from withholding the income exempt under article 14 or under a treaty, and it does so with an express condition: «without prejudice to the obligation to file provided for in paragraph 5 of this article». Article 15.2 of the regulation closes it from the other side, requiring the nominal list to include «those paid income on which no withholding was practised under paragraph 4 of article 31». So form 296 is wider than the sum of the year’s four form 216s, by construction rather than by mistake, and anyone hunting a euro-for-euro reconciliation is hunting something the rule does not promise. What must match to the cent is the withholding, because that is the same «amounts withheld» in both forms.
There are four answers, not two, and they sit in three consecutive paragraphs
Article 31.4.a) has three paragraphs and each does something different. The first exempts the income from withholding and keeps the duty to report it: not on the 216, yes on the 296, which is the case of interest paid to a European Union resident under letter c) of article 14.1. The second restores withholding to letters k) and l), the dividends paid to European Union pension funds and to certain collective investment undertakings, which are exempt and withheld anyway: they go on both. The third says there is «no obligation to file a return in respect of the income referred to in article 14.1.d)», which is Spanish government debt: it goes on neither. With ordinary taxable income, which goes on both, that is four cells and three distinct answers.
The deadline changed in 2024, and the regulation did not notice
Article 11 of Order EHA/3290/2008 has two wordings. The original said, «in accordance with article 15.2 of the Regulation», that filing took place «in the first twenty natural days of January», with an exception reaching 31 January for anyone filing on computer-readable media and a bridging sentence treating electronic filing as such media: between the two, nobody could reach the twenty-day general rule. The wording in force since 1 February 2024, by article 2.3 of Order HAC/56/2024, says the window «shall run from 1 January to 31 January of the following year» and no longer refers to the regulation. Meanwhile article 15.2 of the regulation, whose latest version dates from 2014, still says twenty days. Two rules of one system that stopped agreeing, and the one that governs the form is the Order that approves it.
One Order, two forms, and only one carries its own shift clause
Article 4 of the Order, the one for form 216, ends by saying that «due dates falling on a Saturday or a non-working day shall be understood as moved to the next working day». Article 11, the one for form 296, in the same Order seven articles away, does not have it. The annual summary’s shift comes from article 30.5 of Act 39/2015, the general administrative rule. The practical answer is the same and the legal route is not, and it is checkable by reading a single norm: 31 January 2026 is a Saturday and the tax agency files the 2025 annual summary under «Up to 2 February».
The article’s second deadline is on no calendar
The second paragraph of the article in force requires the payee-record annexes called «Negotiable securities. Schedule of payments to taxpayers» and «Negotiable securities. Schedule of payment certificates» to be filed «during the natural month following the date of filing of form 210». It is a due date hanging off when another form was filed rather than off the calendar, so two entities with the same reporting year have two different dates and no published table can hold them. The month runs from date to date, with the end-of-month clamp of article 30.4 of Act 39/2015: file the form 210 on 31 January and the annex is due on 28 February, not 3 March.
What the consolidated text still prints and no longer exists
Article 9 of the Order, in today’s consolidated text, still describes paper filing for returns of up to fifteen payee records and «12 cm CD-R» media of up to 700 MB in ISO/IEC DIS 9660:1999 format. None of it survives: article 12 of Order HAP/2194/2013 removed the paper route for information returns, and it did so by a general repealing clause. A repeal by clause leaves no note in a consolidated text, because the consolidator can only annotate what a rule expressly amends, so the article reads whole and apparently in force. The complete rule is: the form’s own Order for what only it can say, and the general information-returns Order for the channel.
Worked example
A Spanish company pays two German suppliers with no permanent establishment during 2025 and, on top of that, 60,000 euros of interest to an individual resident in France. The services carry 19% withholding and add up to 100,000 euros of income and 19,000 of withholding, which go onto the year’s four form 216s. The interest is exempt under letter c) of article 14.1, so nothing is withheld and it appears on no form 216. Form 296 carries both: the nominal list reports 160,000 euros of income and 19,000 of withholding, meaning 37.5% of the annual summary’s amount was never in an autoliquidation. The withholdings match, the amount does not, and there is nothing to correct. Had the same company also paid government-debt coupons to a non-resident, those would go on neither the 216 nor the 296.
Frequently asked questions
What is Spanish form 296?
Must it reconcile with my form 216s?
Does exempt income belong on form 296?
Which income appears on no form at all?
Is there exempt income that is still withheld?
When is form 296 due?
Why does the regulation say twenty days and the Order thirty-one?
And the negotiable-securities annexes?
Can it be filed on paper?
What must I give the payee?
Related calculators & reading
Embed this calculator
Paste this code on your site to show the calculator. It includes an attribution link.
Preview
Sources
- Texto refundido de la Ley del Impuesto sobre la Renta de no Residentes, artículos 14 y 31: las rentas exentas, los cuatro casos del apartado 4 y el resumen anual del apartado 5 · Boletín Oficial del Estado
- Reglamento del Impuesto sobre la Renta de no Residentes, artículo 15: la relación nominativa que incluye a quien cobró sin retención, el certificado al perceptor y los veinte días de enero que la Orden ya no cita · Boletín Oficial del Estado
- Orden EHA/3290/2008, artículos 4, 9 y 11: la cláusula de traslado que sólo lleva el modelo 216, las formas de presentación y el plazo del modelo 296 con el anexo de valores negociables · Boletín Oficial del Estado
- Orden HAC/56/2024, de 25 de enero, artículo 2.3: la reescritura del artículo 11 que fija el plazo del 1 al 31 de enero y deja de derivarlo del reglamento, con efectos desde el 1 de febrero de 2024 · Boletín Oficial del Estado
- Ley 39/2015, artículo 30: el cómputo de los plazos por meses de fecha a fecha y el traslado del vencimiento inhábil al primer día hábil siguiente · Boletín Oficial del Estado
- Calendario del contribuyente 2026, hasta el 2 de febrero: el resumen anual 2025 del modelo 296, junto al modelo 190 y al modelo 180 · Agencia Tributaria
Author: Thorben Rasmus Idel · Reviewed by: Nahar Geva · Last reviewed: